Does it make sense to build states? Alternatives in conflict and insecurity
A major debate is brewing on what to do about ‘failed states’, lawlessness and endemic violence. Is the solution to ‘build states’? Or should we be looking at alternatives?
New analysts have begun to unsettle the conventional wisdom. But establishment organisations such as the World Bank are failing to take the changing evidence into account.
On the one side we have what might be called the establishment position. Most official aid agencies, including DFID (pdf, 1mb), hold this view, as do official international organisations like the OECD (pdf).
These organisations’ view is that states should be built. Where there are problems of lawlessness, ‘ungoverned spaces’, ‘failed states’ or endemic conflict, the solution is to put states back together again. This perspective might suggest, for example that all of Somalia should be governed by a single, national government...
Read the full article on the Governance and Development blog.
Image credit: Dermot Tatlow / Panos
Related Content - News & Blogs
BLOG: New special issue: Global land governance
KNOTS blog on exploring global land, water and green grab
Related Content - Research
Related Content - Events
The Search for Stability through Stabilisation: Case Studies from Afghanistan and Nepal
28 May 2013 13:00 to 14:30
Room 221, Institute of Development Studies
India’s dream run, 2003-2008
29 May 2013 13:00 to 14:30
Room 221, IDS
Will the BRICS Bank change development and shift the global balance of power?
11 June 2013 18:00 to 19:30
Committee Room 16, House of Commons