People-centred M&E: Aligning Incentives So Agriculture Does More to Reduce Hunger
IDS Bulletin 41.6
View this publication
After more than two decades of hiatus agriculture is back on the agenda of donors and governments. Issues of harmonisation, results orientation, mutual accountability and payments for performance have become mantras in development assistance. Placing intended beneficiaries at the centre stage is the new motto.
But the articles in this seminal IDS Bulletin provide systematic evidence to lay open the widely shared secret among development practitioners that the cupboard of agricultural monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is bare. Agricultural M&E has been weak at best. Where it exists it has concentrated on tools and methods, a narrow focus on project performance ratings and 'rates of return' with accountability upwards to donors rather than downwards to the intended beneficiaries of programmes.
Overview: Getting a More Balanced View of What is Working in Agriculture to Reduce Hunger
The Sorry State of M&E in Agriculture: Can People-centred Approaches Help?
Lawrence Haddad, Johanna Lindstrom and Yvonne Pinto
Commentary on 'The Sorry State of M&E in Agriculture: Can People-centred Approaches Help?'
Evaluation: Why, for Whom and How?
Henry Lucas and Richard Longhurst
Three Approaches to Monitoring: Feedback Systems, Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation and Logical Frameworks
Alex Jacobs, Chris Barnett and Richard Ponsford
A Revolution Whose Time Has Come? The Win-Win of Quantitative Participatory Approaches and Methods
Creating the Missing Feedback Loop
Private Sector Metrics Contributions to Social Change: Customer Satisfaction Meets Agriculture Development
David Bonbright and Jamey Power
Commentary on ‘Private Sector Metrics Contributions to Social Change: Customer Satisfaction Meets Agriculture Development'
Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural Science and Technology Projects: Theories, Practices and Problems
Erik Millstone, Patrick Van Zwanenberg and Fiona Marshall
Incorporating Seasonality into Agricultural Project Design and Learning
Stephen Devereux and Richard Longhurst
Context-specific and Project-induced Risk: Designing Projects for Promoting Resilient Livelihoods
Rachel Sabates-Wheeler, Saul Butters and Martin Greeley
Women's Empowerment, Development Interventions and the Management of Information Flows
A Learning Approach to Monitoring and Evaluation
Katy Oswald and Peter Taylor
Commentary on 'Latin American Experiences on Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning'
Does Research Reduce Poverty? Assessing the Impacts of Policy-oriented Research in Agriculture
Andy Sumner, Edoardo Masset and Rajendra Mulmi
Commentary on 'Does Research Reduce Poverty? Assessing the Impacts of Policyoriented Research in Agriculture'
Raghav Gaiha and Shantanu Mathur
- Published Date
- View source
- View this publication
- Related IDS Researchers
- Lawrence Haddad
- Yvonne Pinto
- Johanna Lindstrom
- Efe Atugba
- Katy Oswald
- Richard Longhurst
- Edoardo Masset
- Andy Sumner
- Naila Kabeer
- Martin Greeley
- Saul Butters
- Rachel Sabates-Wheeler
- Stephen Devereux
- Robert Chambers
- Chris Barnett
- Henry Lucas