fbpx

Journal Article

Cash Transfers and High Food Prices: Explaining outcomes on Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme

Published on 1 January 2010

An ongoing and highly politicised debate concerns the relative efficacy of cash transfers versus food aid. This paper aims to shed light on this debate, drawing on new empirical evidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP).

Our data derive from a two-wave panel survey conducted in 2006 and 2008. Ethiopia has experienced unprecedented rates of inflation since 2007, which have reduced the real purchasing power of PSNP cash payments. Our regression findings confirm that food transfers or ‘cash plus food’ packages are superior to cash transfers alone – they enable higher levels of income growth, livestock accumulation and self-reported food security. These results raise questions of fundamental importance to global humanitarian response and social protection policy. We draw out some implications for the design of social transfer programmes and describe some steps that could be taken to enable ‘predictable transfers to meet predictable needs’.

Authors

Image of Rachel Sabates-Wheeler
Rachel Sabates-Wheeler

Research Fellow

Image of Stephen Devereux
Stephen Devereux

Research Fellow

Publication details

published by
Elsevier
authors
Sabates-Wheeler, R. and Devereux, S.
journal
Food Policy, volume 35, issue 4
doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.01.001

Share

About this publication

Region
Ethiopia

Related content