Journal Article

28

Does Local Co-operation Matter? Evidence from Industrial Clusters in South Asia and Latin America

Published on 1 January 2000

Inter-firm co-operation has been a major theme in the industrial cluster debate but has rarely been investigated systematically. Does it matter? What kind is most relevant? When is it most important?

This paper draws together the results of four cluster studies from South Asia and Latin America. It shows that, while local external economies accrue clusterwide co-operation tends to be selective. In spite of considerable variations in the extent and type of co-operation, some clear results emerge from the four studies. First, co-operating enterprises tend to perform better. Second, recent competitive pressures have led to increases in vertical rather than horizontal co-operation. Third, vertical co-operation increases most when major improvements in quality and speed are required but diminishes subsequently. The paper concludes with two suggestions for further research, one concerned with the role of public mediators in private conflicts and one concerned with shifting the attention from (cluster) internal to external relationships.

Cite this publication

Schmitz, H. (2000), 'Does Local Co-operation Matter? Evidence from Industrial Clusters in South Asia & Latin America', Oxford Development Studies 28: 323-336, doi: 10.1080/713688314.

Authors

Hubert Schmitz

Emeritus Fellow

Publication details

journal
Oxford Development Studies, volume 28, issue 3

Share

About this publication

Related content

Brief

Fiscal Measures to Support Post-Pandemic Resilience

Research for Policy and Practice Report

Jayant Menon & 5 others

7 February 2024