Working Paper

CDI Practice Paper 19

Getting the Most Out of Participatory Impact Assessment: Reflections from a Multi-Country Cash Transfer Impact Assessment

Published on 1 August 2018

Mixed methods approaches are widely used in impact evaluations, but all too often a ‘methodological gap’ emerges between broad, large-scale surveys and in-depth, small-scale qualitative investigation that can be difficult to bridge.

In this CDI Practice Paper we reflect on a multi-country impact assessment of cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. Within a broader mixed methods suite of research modules we discuss specifically the design of a qualitative module that used participatory methods to integrate quantitative and qualitative data and analysis. We conclude that future impact assessment design can utilise this self-standing ‘within-module’ participatory research approach to move beyond an impact assessment norm of often poorly integrated large-scale quantitative surveys and in-depth qualitative investigation.

Authors

Jeremy Holland
Ramlatu Attah
Valentina Barca
Clare O’Brien
Simon Brook
Eleanor Fisher
Andrew Kardan

Publication details

published by
IDS
authors
Jeremy Holland, Ramlatu Attah, Valentina Barca, Clare O’Brien, Simon Brook, Eleanor Fisher and Andrew Kardan
issn
2053-0536
language
English

Cite this publication

Holland, J.; Attah, R.; Barca, V.; O’Brien, C.; Brook, S.; Fisher, E. and Kardan, A. (2018) Getting the Most Out of Participatory Impact Assessment: Reflections from a Multi-Country Cash Transfer Impact Assessment, CDI Practice Paper 19, Brighton: IDS

Citation copied

Share

About this publication

Programmes and centres
Centre for Development Impact

Related content