Publication

23

Policymaking in Multiparty Presidential Regimes: A Comparison between Brazil and Ecuador

Published on 1 October 2010

This paper explores why two countries with similar electoral, partisan, and presidential institutions, have produced significantly different policy outcomes in Latin America. Brazil and Ecuador are conventionally known as having highly fragmented party systems, where legislators have great incentives to cultivate a personal vote. Presidents are perceived to be strong and to make large use of government resources in order to advance their agenda. Yet, policies in Brazil are more likely to respond to shocks and to be more stable over time than policies in Ecuador, where policies remain vulnerable to political changes and realignments.

We argue that this variation is explained by the different nature of political coalitions formed in each country. We identify three factors that increase the executive’s ability to craft governing coalitions in congress: the availability of valuable coalition currencies, the influence of long-term political horizons, and the extent to which political transactions are credibly and effectively enforced.

Publication details

published by
Wiley-Blackwell
authors
Mejía Acosta, A. and Pereira, C.
editors
Alasdair Roberts and Robert H. Cox
journal
Governance, volume 23, issue 4

Share

About this publication

Related content

Student Opinion

Support for first-generation learners

Rachna Vyas, IDS student, MA Governance, Development & Public Policy

27 March 2024

Opinion

The sanitation circular economy - rhetoric vs. reality

Deepa Joshi & 2 others

18 March 2024