Brief

IDS Policy Briefing;48

Undercurrents of Violence: Why Sierra Leone’s Political Settlement is not Working

Published on 13 January 2014

Debates over violence, security, humanitarian and development imperatives have long been polarised. However, as seen in Syria and Mali, the question is not simply whether one should intervene but rather how and for whose benefit. In this context, a closer look at the case of Sierra Leone – touted in many circles as a success story – yields interesting insights into the limits of its political settlement.

Pro-poor development outcomes need to be at the heart of any negotiated political settlement. Failure to address fundamental issues around access to power, accountability regarding control of natural resources, and extreme poverty itself has resulted in marginalisation and disenfranchisement, and new forms of violence.

Authors

Jeremy Allouche

Professorial Fellow

Publication details

published by
IDS
authors
Allouche, Jeremy
journal
IDS Policy Briefing, issue 48
language
English

Share

About this publication

Programmes and centres
Addressing and mitigating violence
Region
Sierra Leone

Related content

Working Paper

The Politics of Social Assistance in Lebanon: Social Protection, Sectarianism, and Lebanon’s Fragmented Social Contract

BASIC Research Working Paper 32

5 February 2025

Brief

The Politics of Social Assistance in Lebanon

BASIC Research Policy Briefing 5

5 February 2025

Student Opinion

Applying knowledge & skills from the MA Poverty & Development

Molly Charker, IDS alumni

22 January 2025