Working Paper

CDI Practice Paper 5

Multiple Pathways to Policy Impact: Testing an Uptake Theory with QCA

Published on 1 October 2013

Policy impact is a complex process influenced by multiple factors. An intermediate step in this process is policy uptake, or the adoption of measures by policymakers that reflect research findings and recommendations.

The path to policy uptake often involves activism, lobbying and advocacy work by civil society organisations, so an earlier intermediate step could be termed ‘advocacy uptake’; which would be the use of research findings and recommendations by Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in their efforts to influence government policy.

This CDI Practice Paper by Barbara Befani proposes a ‘broad-brush’ theory of policy uptake (more precisely of ‘advocacy uptake’) and then tests it using two methods: (1) a type of statistical analysis and (2) a variant of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).

The pros and cons of both families of methods are discussed in this paper, which shows that QCA offers the power of generalisation whilst also capturing some of the complexity of middle-range explanation. A limited number of pathways to uptake are identified, which are at the same time moderately sophisticated (considering combinations of causal factors rather than additions) and cover a medium number of cases (40), allowing a moderate degree of generalisation.

Cite this publication

Befani, B. (2013) 'Multiple Pathways to Policy Impact: Testing an Uptake Theory with QCA', CDI Practice Paper 5, Brighton: IDS

Publication details

published by
Befani, Barbara
CDI Practice Paper, issue 5


About this publication

Related content