Two broad approaches are possible in commenting upon Dudley Seers’s paper. One can accept the terms of his argument and discuss his facts, his logic and his conclusions; or one can reject the
basis of his position, dispute his underlying assumptions and pose a different set of questions.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.