fbpx

Working Paper

ICTD Research in Brief 47

Enhancing Property Rates Administration, Collection and Enforcement in Uganda: The Case of Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) and four other Municipalities

Published on 23 September 2019

Uganda embraced decentralisation as a system of governance in the early 1990’s. The success of decentralisation was pegged on the capacity of the local governments to mobilise their own revenues in order to fulfill their responsibilities.

Before its suspension in 2005 and eventual abolition in 2008, graduated tax constituted a dominant source of local revenue. Although Local Services Tax (LST) and Local Hotel Tax (LHT) were introduced to fill the funding gap left by the abolition of graduated tax, their yield remains significantly low. Consequently, local governments are still heavily dependent on central government funding – a position that undermines their autonomy. Property rates, a form of property taxation, have emerged as a key source of local revenue. Property rates provide a stable and sustainable source of revenue for local governments, partly driven by urbanisation. Summary of ATAP Working Paper 13 by David Bakibinga and Dan Ngabirano

Cite this publication

Bakibinga, D. and Ngabirano, D. (2019) Enhancing Property Rates Administration, Collection and Enforcement in Uganda: The Case of Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) and four other Municipalities, ICTD Research in Brief 47, Brighton, IDS

Citation copied

Authors

David Bakibinga
Dan Ngabirano

Publication details

published by
ICTD and IDS
language
English

Share

About this publication

Region
Uganda

Related content