Can you help shape our future priorities? Take a five minute survey now. Survey closes on 8 July.

Journal Article

Preference-Matching and Violent Ethnic Conflict: The Heterogeneous Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation on Local Majorities and Local Minorities

Published on 1 January 2012

In this paper I draw on the study by Saideman et al. (2002) which has contrasted the effect of federalism with respect to the degree of groups spatial concentration. The study found that the intensity of rebellion decreased with federalism, but this was true only for spatially concentrated groups.

I undertake a similar approach for fiscal decentralization and consider that beside groups spatial concentration, the local majority status of groups is crucial to understand why some groups increase their level of violence and why some others decrease it when decentralization goes up. In a nutshell the rationale is as follows.

Authors

Jean-Pierre Tranchant

Research Fellow

Publication details

authors
Tranchant, J-P.
journal
Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Share

Related content

Working Paper

BASIC Research Global Review: Widening Social Protection Approaches and Practice to Achieve Crisis-Resilient Social Protection

BASIC Research Working Paper 65

Rachel Slater & 2 others

8 July 2026

Working Paper

Sustaining Social Protection in Conflict Settings

BASIC Research Working Paper 64

8 July 2026

Working Paper

‘Some returned trembling with fear… and some did not return’ Case Study: Sustaining Social Protection in Iraq

BASIC Research Working Paper 61

8 July 2026

Working Paper

Capacities for Sustaining Social Protection in Conflict Settings

BASIC Research Working Paper 63

8 July 2026